Key Theories and Theorists in Narrative Discourse Analysis

Narrative Analysis is an essential aspect of Discourse Analysis that investigates how stories are constructed and understood within various contexts. This approach not only explores the structural elements of narratives, such as plot and character, but also delves into the deeper functions narratives serve in shaping personal identities, cultural norms, and social relations. Fundamental to this study are seminal models and theories, including William Labov’s structural model of narratives, Jerome Bruner’s narrative construction of reality, and Michel Foucault’s insights into the power dynamics within discursive practices. These foundational concepts and models provide valuable frameworks for analyzing how narratives influence and are influenced by the broader sociocultural environment.

1. Labov’s Model of Narrative Analysis

William Labov’s model of narrative analysis is a seminal framework in the field of sociolinguistics and has had a profound impact on the study of narrative within discourse analysis. Developed in the 1970s, Labov’s model was designed to analyze personal experience narratives collected during sociolinguistic interviews. His six-part model provides a structured approach to understanding how everyday oral narratives are constructed, making it possible to analyze the underlying structures and functions of storytelling in natural settings.

1) Labov’s Six-Part Model of Narrative Structure

Labov’s model outlines six key components that are commonly found in oral narratives of personal experience. These components help to organize the story and enhance both its comprehensibility and engagement:

1. Abstract: The abstract is a brief summary of the story that serves to catch the listener’s attention. It acts as a preview that signals the narrative content and invites the audience to listen.
2. Orientation: This part provides the background information necessary for understanding the story. It typically includes details about the setting (time and place), the characters involved, and the situational context. Orientation sets the stage for the events to unfold.
3. Complicating Action: The complicating action is the core of the narrative, detailing the sequence of events that form the main action or plot of the story. It builds tension and leads to a climax, showing the challenges or conflicts faced by the characters.
4. Evaluation: Perhaps the most crucial element of the narrative, the evaluation explains the significance of the events. It reveals why the story is worth telling and helps the listener understand the narrator’s perspective and emotional experience. Evaluations can be explicit, with the narrator directly commenting on the meaning, or implicit, woven into the way events are described.
5. Resolution: The resolution details how the complicating action was resolved or what the outcome of the events was. It provides closure to the narrative arc, resolving the tensions built up in the complicating action.
6. Coda: The coda serves to bring the listener back to the present moment, signaling that the narrative is ending. It often provides a reflection on the story’s aftermath or its impact on the narrator’s life, helping to contextualize the narrative within the broader experiences of the narrator.

2) Relevance in Discourse Analysis

Labov’s model is highly relevant in discourse analysis for several reasons:

• Structure and Coherence: The model provides a clear framework for analyzing how narratives are structured to ensure coherence and engagement. By identifying these components in a narrative, analysts can assess how effectively a story is communicated and understood.
• Sociocultural Contexts: Labov’s model facilitates the exploration of how narratives function within different sociocultural contexts. The orientation and evaluation components, in particular, allow analysts to explore how narrators position themselves and their stories within their cultural and social environments.
• Personal Identity and Social Interaction: Through its focus on personal narratives, Labov’s model is useful for studying how individuals use storytelling to shape and express their identities. The evaluation and coda components, for instance, offer insights into the narrator’s personal reflections and the narrative’s role in their life.
• Linguistic Features: Labov’s emphasis on the structural and linguistic aspects of narratives aids in understanding how language is used to construct meaningful and effective stories. This approach is beneficial for linguists and discourse analysts who are interested in the interaction between language use and social function.

Overall, Labov’s model of narrative analysis provides a robust tool for dissecting and understanding the complexities of oral storytelling within the framework of discourse analysis. It highlights how narrative structure, content, and style are intertwined with cultural, social, and personal dimensions, offering rich insights into human communication.

2. Bruner’s Narrative Construction of Reality

Jerome Bruner’s contributions to the field of narrative discourse analysis are deeply influential, particularly his theory on the narrative construction of reality. Bruner, a pioneering figure in cognitive psychology, argued that human beings make sense of the world primarily through stories. This narrative mode of thought is distinct from the logical-scientific mode, which seeks to describe the world through universal truths and objective observations. Bruner’s ideas revolve around how narratives shape human thought, identity, and social reality.

1) Bruner’s Theory of Narrative Construction of Reality

Bruner posited that narratives are not mere representations of events but are active constructions that give meaning to these events. This construction shapes how individuals perceive and interact with the world. His theory can be outlined through several key concepts:

1. Narrative as a Mode of Thought: Bruner distinguished between two modes of cognitive functioning: the paradigmatic or logico-scientific mode, which deals with general causes and utilizes abstract reasoning to handle concepts, and the narrative mode, which thinks in terms of human-like intentions and actions. The narrative mode is crucial for understanding human behavior and social interactions because it constructs reality through stories that are compelling and emotionally true, even if not always factually accurate.
2. The Structuring of Plot: Bruner emphasized the importance of plot in narratives, which he believed structures experience by organizing events and actions into a meaningful whole. A plot makes a story intelligible and memorable by introducing intentionality and moral stances, which guide the audience’s interpretation of events.
3. Agency and Intentionality: In narratives, according to Bruner, agency is attributed to characters, allowing them to act with intention within the story. This concept is central to how individuals understand their actions and the actions of others in real life, framing human behavior in terms of goals, desires, and beliefs.
4. Cultural Instrumentality of Narratives: Bruner also explored how narratives are influenced by and in turn influence cultural norms and values. Narratives are tools through which cultures transmit their values and norms from one generation to another, and through which individuals learn to navigate their cultural context.
5. Identity and Self-making: Bruner believed that we construct our identities through the narratives we create about our lives. These personal narratives integrate past experiences with the present self and future aspirations, providing a sense of continuity and purpose.

2) Relevance in Discourse Analysis

Bruner’s theory has profound implications for discourse analysis, particularly in how narratives are used to construct and negotiate social reality. Some relevant applications include:

• Social Identity and Group Dynamics: Analyzing how individuals and groups use narratives to define and assert their identities, and how these narratives support or challenge societal norms and structures.
• Cultural and Historical Narratives: Understanding how narratives shape collective memory and the historical consciousness of a community or nation.
• Narratives in Legal and Medical Settings: Examining how narratives are constructed in high-stakes environments like courtrooms or medical consultations, and how these narratives influence decisions and policies.
• Education and Narrative Pedagogy: Exploring how narrative methods can be used in education to enhance learning through story-based techniques.

Bruner’s narrative construction of reality offers a vital lens for examining the pervasive influence of narrative in shaping human understanding and interaction. By focusing on how narratives organize experience and convey meaning, narrative discourse analysis can uncover deeper insights into the cognitive and cultural dimensions of discourse.

3. Foucault’s Concepts of Discourse

Michel Foucault’s theories on discourse and power are foundational in the field of discourse analysis, significantly impacting how narratives are studied within social and cultural contexts. Foucault, a French philosopher and social theorist, did not directly focus on narrative analysis in the traditional sense but his ideas about discourse, power, and knowledge provide critical tools for understanding the role of narratives in constructing social reality.

1) Foucault’s Concepts of Discourse

Foucault’s conception of discourse is broader and more complex than mere language use. For Foucault, discourses are practices that systematically form the objects of which they speak. Discourses, in Foucault’s terms, are not just ways of expressing ideas; they are the means through which power relations are produced and reproduced within society.

Key aspects of Foucault’s theory relevant to narrative analysis include:

1. Discourse as Power/Knowledge: Foucault argued that knowledge is not just passively recorded by discourse but is produced through discursive practices. This production of knowledge is intrinsically linked to power, as what can be said (discourse) and what is known (knowledge) are controlled by what he calls “regimes of truth.” These regimes are established by social institutions such as the media, academia, and government, which determine the boundaries of what is considered true or false.
2. Discursive Formations: Foucault introduced the concept of “discursive formations,” or the rules and systems that determine how particular truths are established within specific fields (e.g., medicine, law, science). These formations govern the statements that can be made within those fields and the positions from which individuals can speak.
3. The Role of Institutions: According to Foucault, institutions play a crucial role in defining and maintaining discourses. Institutions control the discourse by setting limits on what is sayable and knowable, thereby exerting power over individuals and groups.
4. Subjectivity and Discourse: Foucault also explored how discourses shape individual subjectivities—how people understand themselves and are understood by others. He argued that the subject is not a pre-given entity but is constructed through discursive practices. This has profound implications for narrative analysis as it suggests that narratives (personal stories, historical accounts, etc.) are instrumental in constructing identities.

2) Impact on Narrative Analysis

Foucault’s theories have been instrumental in narrative discourse analysis by providing tools to examine how narratives contribute to the construction of knowledge and the exercise of power. His influence is evident in several key areas:

• Critical Examination of Narratives: Foucault’s work encourages analysts to question the origins of narratives and whose interests they serve. This involves examining who controls the narrative and the institutional forces that shape it.
• Deconstruction of Master Narratives: Foucault’s concept of power/knowledge has been used to critique “master narratives” or dominant stories that claim universality. Narrative analysts use his theories to explore alternative narratives or “counter-narratives” that challenge dominant discourses.
• Analysis of Identity in Narratives: Foucault’s ideas on subjectivity are crucial in understanding how narratives shape and are shaped by identities. This involves analyzing how narratives contribute to the formation of subject positions and social identities within specific discursive contexts.
• Ethical and Political Dimensions: Foucault’s focus on the ethics and political implications of discourse and power relations enriches narrative analysis by highlighting the ethical considerations in how stories are told and used.

In summary, Michel Foucault’s theories provide a robust framework for analyzing the interplay between narrative, discourse, and power, enriching our understanding of how narratives function within societal structures to shape knowledge, identities, and power relations.

Conclusion

The foundational concepts of Narrative Analysis in Discourse Analysis offer profound insights into the intricate ways narratives shape and reflect human experience. William Labov’s model provides a systematic approach to dissecting the structural components of narratives, revealing how they are crafted to achieve coherence and impact. Jerome Bruner’s exploration of narrative as a mode of thought emphasizes the role of storytelling in constructing reality and shaping human cognition. Meanwhile, Michel Foucault’s analysis of discourse highlights the power structures that underlie narrative practices, influencing what can be said and who has the authority to speak. Together, these theories and models enrich our understanding of narrative as a powerful communicative tool that constructs social realities and personal identities, offering diverse approaches to studying narrative across different fields and contexts.

Frequently Asked Questions